The Olympics - a world political force
This article belongs to Australia - Land of the Free? column.
Wherever you are in the world, I hope you enjoyed the television coverage of the Olympic Games from Beijing China.
You were no doubt thrilled by the exploits of Usain Bolt and Michael Phelps and many others as they performed feats that are at the very top of human performance.
Then you cheered for your country's sports men and women as they put the name of your country in front of the world's media. The medal count of your country was checked to see how you compared to the rest of the world.
Australia is near the top of the medal count and mixing it with the heavy weights in world sport. For a small country to win, at last count, fourteen gold medals and about forty overall is a great performance.
But no, it's not good enough for the media in Australia. The Government is being criticised for not putting enough money into training sports people to give us a better result at the Olympics.
Bird's Nest Stadium
The Olympics is a contest between countries as well as between athletes. A good result translates to a government supporting sporting heroes and therefore deserves your vote at the next election. It is also about pride, Olympic medals make everyone proud. People who are proud are likely to feel better about leaders who supported their heroes.
As an example, take the British track cycling team. At the Athens' games the British won a few medals but the real stars were the Australians. At Beijing the British won almost all the medals. They admitted the government, through a lottery, poured huge amounts of money into buying the best coaches, mechanics and identifying the most likely performers and nurturing them into the program.
An Australian swimming coach admitted selling his very successful program to the Chinese, the result - China gold and silver, the Australian bronze.
So, billions is being poured into training athletes because it translates into votes when a country climbs up the medal count.
China has been able to showcase its country to the world through the games. In addition, they are on top of the medal count. They were able to recognise the value in these achievements politically and to bring their country out of the darkness of the Cultural Revolution into the light of a modern country willing to trade with the world. In many ways, offsetting the problem they have with Tibet.
The athletes are heroes. Many of them are successful without massive support. They are the ones that will keep us watching.
What a pity they are pawns in the greater political contest.
Picture courtesy of the Beijing Olympics website.
more in Sports
Spring has sprung in NYC. This means outdoor running for me. Itís one of my favorite exercises and I consider it fundamental to any exercise routine.
Ah spring, when a young manís fancy lightly turns to thoughts of love, and a middle-aged manís fancy severely turns to thoughts of basketball. College basketball, that is. And Iím not talking about some kiss-your-sister contest like the NIT, Iím talking about the Big Dance, the NCAA Tournament.
I am inclined to pen this article, having read REECE PEACOCK Ďs piece in the Cheers about the second test match currently in progress in Australia between India and Australia.
You can try to convince me as much as you would like the 2007 Patriots are one of the best teams in sports history. They have arguably the best quarterback in football history, one of the best receiving cores ever, and the sickest mad scientist for a coach ever. I will disagree with the first one.
On January the 6th Harbhajan Singh received a 3-match ban from the International Cricket Council for supposedly racially taunting Symonds. Then the bombshell.