Is the USA Alliance still good for Australia
This article belongs to Australia - Land of the Free? column.
This week Australians have witnessed our new Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, swanning around Washington. Our newspapers and TV screens have been full of self-satisfied grinning faces of Rudd with Bush, and the three presidential candidates.
Australian Prime Minister
All of this forelock touching and fawning over each other is to preserve the US and Australian Alliance we are told.
At one time the Alliance was vital to Australia. In 1942 when the Japanese were driving down through Asia with Australia abandoned by Great Britain, the United States of America rode into the breach personified by General Douglas Macarthur rushing to the great South Land after being defeated in the Philippines and in a word saved the nation from being invaded. Although, our own troops on the Kokoda Track and the Huon Peninsula in New Guinea had a lot to do with stopping the Japanese too.
Australia was grateful, and has been ever since. So much so that Australian service men and women have been involved in all of America's wars ever since. If the US goes to war so does Australia. However, there always seems to be a reason forthcoming other than support for the US such as the Communist threat in both Korea and Vietnam, Islamic terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan.
For all of this support Australia USA trade is out of balance and US farmers have lobbied the politicians to keep Australian goods out of their markets. Unfair trade barriers limit access to US markets in music and entertainment.
The reason for the loyalty is fear. Australia sits in Asia, close to Indonesia and China. Although, now much closer politically to our Asian neighbours, Australians are still nervous that someone may wish to expand their territory into the Great South Land.
Perhaps with new Asian migrants in all parts of Australia, and with much more understanding of where we sit in the scheme in our part of the world, this reliance on America will contract until we learn to trust our neighbours.
Now is the time to cut back on slavishly following our powerful friend, but still preserve the alliance. It's possible to still be friends without agreeing with every action and maintaining our dignity.
It should also be recognised that when the US came to Australia's rescue in 1942 it was in their interest to do so. If the Japanese didn't attack Pearl Harbour would they have been so willing to assist?
Likewise, these days, America only does what is of benefit to them. Perhaps in the future Australia's interest won't coincide with the USA.
more in Politics
At last Ukrainian Cabinet of Ministers ratified the agreement between “Naftogas Ukraine” and Russian “Gasprom” about gas supply for Ukraine until the end of 2008.
Ignoring the continued international pressure to boycott the ruling military junta of Burma (Myanmar), India has geared up for signing of a deal to develop a port in western Burmese coast for the benefit of its restive Northeast, where secessionist movement had inspired a number of insurgent outfits to declare a war against New Delhi even after 60 years of India's independence.
I am seeing articles about how marking positions to market is contributing to the recession and how it should be stopped or amended almost daily in the financial press. But this is dangerous thinking, because if you cannot mark to market, then how did you manage to value it in the first place and if you did, who was the idiot who bought it without having the ability to value it on a mark to market basis? Because that is what it means.
Before people were fainting at Barack Obama rallies, I was sent to Springfield, Illinois to cover the announcement of his candidacy on a bone-chilling February morning. Pains than come with sub-zero temperatures were replaced by chills of hope as Obama made promises in the same space where Lincoln once stood.
Governments and other parties use refugees for their own purposes, and not just for humanitarian reasons either