Global Warming Tyranny
Government officials calling for suppression of dissent is not new. We've seen it happen over and over again in totalitarian states and theocracies throughout the world.
Where is the outrage?
However, it appears we've turned some sort of horrific corner here in the U.S. since Senators John D. Rockefeller IV (D-Moron-WV) and Olympia Snowe (R-Idiot-VT) feel confident enough to send an open letter to ExxonMobil demanding the company end its support for climate change skeptics.
The entire letter is a disgusting attempt to suppress any debate on the issue. The letter's penultimate paragraph is particularly repulsive:
"In light of the adverse impacts still resulting from your corporations activities, we must request that ExxonMobil end any further financial assistance or other support to groups or individuals whose public advocacy has contributed to the small, but unfortunately effective, climate change denial myth. Further, we believe ExxonMobil should take additional steps to improve the public debate, and consequently the reputation of the United States. We would recommend that ExxonMobil publicly acknowledge both the reality of climate change and the role of humans in causing or exacerbating it. Second, ExxonMobil should repudiate its climate change denial campaign and make public its funding history. Finally, we believe that there would be a benefit to the United States if one of the world's largest carbon emitters headquartered here devoted at least some of the money it has invested in climate change denial pseudo-science to global remediation efforts. We believe this would be especially important in the developing world, where the disastrous effects of global climate change are likely to have their most immediate and calamitous impacts."Full text of the letter can be found at the Wall Street Journal site:
Regardless of where one stands on the climate change debate, we should all be disturbed by the fact that this is not the ranting of some half-baked, anarchist street protester, but rather a calculated, written and explicit threat against private citizens by two United States senators.
The Wall Street Journal has an op-ed that condemns the Senators' letter but which, in my opinion, lacks any tone of real outrage.
WSJ editorial at:
More to the point is a press release from the Ayn Rand Institute condemning the letter for what it is: an egregious attack on free speech. The Institute rightly denounces the Rockefeller/Snowe letter in no uncertain terms.
"Observe that the senators do not offer a single fact intended to convince ExxonMobil of the truth of their position. Their message is not 'agree with us because,' but 'agree with us or else.' That is a message appropriate to a dictator, not to the representatives of a free nation.
"Defenders of free speech must stand up against this vicious attempt to intimidate ExxonMobil into embracing the global warming cause, and declare that the government has no business telling Americans what they should think or say."
Full text of the ARI press release:
Coercion has no place in a scientific debate. Increasingly, climate change advocates who are unable to advance their viewpoints rationally are resorting to intimidation and threats of reprisals against anyone who doesn't agree with them.
Censorship of this sort is a more dangerous and immediate threat than any imagined climate catastrophe.
more in Politics
Private contracts awarded by the federal government are nothing new. They are an old tool of the government, where those with special ties in the right government places are awarded lucrative contracts.
Highly dangerous cults of hate like Al Qaeda are social mutations that grow virulently and seem unstoppable. But they are not invincible and are bedeviled with contradictions that can eventually consume them. Much depends on them having the right conditions to flourish. To live they must kill, to survive others must die. But still they are ultimately doomed by the futility of their very existence.
Helicopters falling from the skies, cult uprisings, "Mission Impossible" adventures and "Grozny"-style battles all make this surge different. Already in preparation the insurgency is showing itself ready and prepared to fight back. The madness of war is everywhere in a reckless, belligerency, mixed with new found professionalism that threatens a great conflagaration.
They say that whom the gods wish to destroy they first make mad. It is also said that madness can be defined by doing the same thing again and again and getting the same wrong result, without ever changing. Sisyphus was one such poor soul in question. Condemned by the Gods to roll a rock up and hill and watch it fall down again, and then continue to repeat the hopeless process for the rest of eternity. His crime had been to try to cheat the Gods, by cheating death and becoming one of them. Likewise the US is now condemned for trying to cheat defeat in Iraq, to repeating the same old mad policies over and over again. If once there was method in the madness, there is now madness in the method. This dysfunctional behaviour can only finally result in some unspeakable abomination.
To say that the United Nations human rights processes are a farce is to state the obvious rather mildly. Human rights abuses, war crimes and other crimes against humanity put the U.N. in danger of collapse.