Dear Professor:
President Bush recently made an appointment of a
federal judge while Congress was in recess. What is all the flap over
his action?
Dear Kurt:
Good thing you brought this up; it is important that we take an objective look at this critical topic.
Firstly,
all the President has done with his recess appointment of that federal
judge is throw a big-time, ill-conceived, despicable, uncalled-for,
out-of-line temper tantrum. I'm so mad that I could kick my dog. In
fact I did, but only once, because then he bit me.
As you may
know, a recess appointment is a temporary appointment of a judge, made
during a Congressional recess, just to get around the Senate
confirmation process.
Sometimes using this approach is an
absolute necessity. For example, President Clinton appointed a judge to
the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. This was a brilliant move by a
brilliant president. He knew that the Senate would not approve his
appointment (what a man of intuition), and since he was unwilling to
let an eminently qualified judge be rejected by the Senate, he used
this little end run around Congress to get his man into the position of
federal appeals judge.
What is absolutely outrageous about
President Bush's appointment is his reasons for making this recess
appointment. Here's a man with absolutely no political prowess. During
his tenure, members of the Senate have used filibusters to
single-handedly prevent approval of some of his judicial nominations
(well, duh!), and since he is unwilling to allow an eminently qualified
judge be kept on hold by the Senate, he used this little end run around
Congress to get his man onto the federal court.
See the difference?
Outrageous, huh? Oh, I could just spit! I'm so furious. Really! [BB]
Now
let me be the first to say that there is absolutely nothing illegal
with what the President did. He has explicit authority from the
Constitution to do this. Also, there is nothing immoral with what the
President did. This is just a routine political move in the day-to-day
give-and-take of governmental actions. There's not even anything
unethical with what the president did. He's the president, and this is
one of the tools the he has at his disposal to move his agenda forward.
Still,
it's just wrong. That's all. Don't ask me how, but it is. It is just
totally, unequivocally evil. That is so obvious -- even an adolescent
political observer ripe with the acne of governmental naivete can see
that!
The problem is that President Bush is just bowing to what
the public wants. That's hogwash, though. The President is supposed to
be a leader. He gets elected to govern, not to follow. The President
should take a cue from President Clinton. The latter governed by
following the will of the people. Now that's leadership!
Frankly, though, I don't even care about this whole issue. Call it sour grapes if you must -- but it's not! Really!
Well,
what if the president gets some of his ideologues on a federal bench.
So What!! Now, I'm not saying I'm going to take my football and go
home, but there are so many proper-minded ideologues on the bench that
a conservative ideologue sprinkled here or there throughout the
judiciary just isn't going to make much difference. So, I say, "SO
WHAT!!!"
I can live with this -- for now.
I realize it
has probably been frustrating to have me take such a guarded approach,
moving delicately from point to point, in answering your question, but
in order to remain objective, I must speak passionatelessly; it is
important that I maintain an air of impartiality in this "Ask the
Professor" forum.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I shouldn't have to spit in anger -- inside the house. My wife is giving me one of those looks.
The
moral of the story? It's twofold. Firstly, to be a leader, President
Bush should be more like President Clinton. Secondly, if you're angry,
don't kick your dog and don't spit in the house.
Capeesh?
Professor
Nutbottom is a Senior Fellow Professor of American Culture at Ivy Leaf
University in Urnotserse, Pennsylvania. He enjoys reading, skiing, and
sorting antique bottle caps. You can learn more about his creator by
visiting
http://pepe-day-2-day.blogspot.com.
The Cheers, (c) Rob Favero, All rights reserved.
Politics
Factzone: The truth about Kim Jong Il
 Kim Jong Il, the leader of the free world, has decided to move on to more fertile grounds, leaving with us just the memories of 8-color rainbows, singing Korean women and couple of nuclear weapons. But who was this man whose next ambition would have been to get the next Nobel Peace prize? Here are just a few facts you should know about.
more Top 5 Conspiracy Theories Related to John F. Kennedy's Assassination 26.Aug 2011 Since just after the assassination of John F. Kennedy, conspiracy theories abou...read
 ISRAEL KEEPING GHADDAFI AFLOAT 10.Mar 2011 ...read
 Glen Beck Is NOT the Anti-Christ! 10.Mar 2011 Hurtful and fiery rhetoric is now media’s default setting! This slippery and m...read
 Recipe for A REVOLUTION! (10 easy steps - try not to get burned!) 28.Feb 2011 Rebellion is cooking in the air. People are mad as hell, and not going to take...read
 Opinion
World governments charged with criminal negligence (in response to Megaupload case)
 EARTH (thecheers.org) - Federal authorities of the universe have charged the governments of all the countries in the world as well as the operators actually in power in these countries with operating a criminal enterprise, the Galaxy warriors announced Today.
more The Great OSCARS 2011 – or so it would seem 5.Mar 2011 So, how exciting......a morning off, the Academy Awards. I wish I could say the...read
 Top 7 Expensive Bordellos. Prostitution: Shakedown, Tier Down, and Priced Out 31.Jan 2011 According to a report of the Washington DC-based US Department of State, The Ph...read
 The Great Secret and Reason for the JFK Assassination 11.Oct 2010 The great question is why the great secret? On June 4 1963, President Kennedy s...read
 Don't Do it! The 3 Worst Times to Get Tattoos 4.Oct 2010 As a general rule, tattoos gotten after 2 am are a bad idea. But in a bigger pi...read
 |
Travel
Travel Warning 13 September 2010 - DO NOT TRAVEL TO IRAN 13.Sep 2010 TRAVELWISE has been watching the situation in Iran for some months in relation ...read
 more TRAVELWISE TRAVEL ADVISORY 5th June 2010. DO NOT TRAVEL TO ISRAEL. 5.Jun 2010 Given the recent incident whereby the Israeli intelligence agency, Mossad, used...read
 TRAVELWISE. 16 APRIL 2010. EUROPEAN TRAVEL ALTERNATIVES 16.Apr 2010 Travelwise issues the following advice in relation to cancelled flights to, fro...read
 TRAVELWISE 6 APRIL 2010. AUSTRALIAN AIR TRAVEL. THE BEST WAYS TO TRAVEL BY AIR IN AUSTRALIA. 5.Apr 2010 Regular readers might have seen and read the various advisory and no-fly notice...read
 TRAVELWISE 2 APRIL 2010. QANTAS. 2.Apr 2010 Some concerns have been raised in relation to some of the maintenance practices...read

 No Payoff From the Playoffs
 $16.50 will Get Anyone in the Hall Mr McGwire
 Stupid Athlete Tricks

 Think Big! Think the World's Largest International Trade Show
 Top 9 cool laptop accessories for laptop geeks
 Twittering: I'm not that interesting

Cheers
|