While the fashion front has been lenient in creating room for more styles and accessories, the literary world often balks at changes in its lineup. A few weeks ago, I explored readers' hesitancy in giving YA novels their due. This week, I'd like to focus on books we see as classics. Why can pearls and the little black dress share space with dangly earrings and shiny gowns, but Charles Dickens and Jane Austen have to keep their distance from John Irving and Mary Gaitskill?
When I was in college, we blamed the resistance to new literary works on school boards and administration. However, I see now that it runs far deeper than that. A friend of mine has admitted to snubbing novels of the twenty-first and late twentieth centuries. She is well-read, but is more willing to accept books and authors from earlier time periods. She will pardon their literary styles - even if not up to par with some current authors - and holds the books in high esteem. Why, I don't know. Is it societal, because we are taught from a young age that these are the authors and works to know; that these works are "good" and worth our time? And, if so, why can some break free of these ingrained notions and others cannot?
I, too, was taught to listen to authority, but I never found myself bound to these old rules. I took each novel as it came. I loved John Steinbeck's and Edith Wharton's examination of human nature. Yet, while I gravitated toward Dickens's exploration of society, I balked at his intense description and writing style. When did laborious prose become a characteristic of fine literature? And who decided that it was a classic in the first place? And even if it once was, why does it have to remain on the required reading list? After all, can there not be new classics? As writing grows and evolves, aren't we doing students a disservice by limiting their literary knowledge to writers of the past?
I am not saying that Leo Tolstoy and Fyodor Dostoevsky should be left at the curb with the weekly trash. No, classic authors of the past provide insight to a different time and morals and allow us to learn from their writing styles. However, why not expand the "good" literature list? Are schools and readers so vain as to think that quality writing stopped one hundred years ago? Ironically, many of these "classic" authors were not considered great in their time. But, we should learn from the past and not wait over one hundred years to give current novels their places on the map.
Many universities and high schools have revised the canon and added contemporary authors to their curriculums. Students in these classrooms have now been exposed to a variety of superior works from which they can hone their own writing skills and develop their own opinion as to what constitutes as "literature." We should all aspire to do the same.
I will give old classics another chance if others will do the same with newer authors. Perhaps, making a list will help. We all have an idea of what we think is necessary for a work to speak to us. For me, it's about the writing (I tend to gravitate toward florid language that not only is beautiful but also moves the plot along, not words just for the sake of words), connection to the characters, and the feeling that a novel has transcended a level of literature though story, theme, etc. - a feeling that this book was special and has changed something within me. If we put down on paper what we think makes a book a classic, we can start to create our own cannon and in the end be exposed to a world we never considered before.
Let's start each other off with a few contemporary novels we consider to be must reads. Here are five that come to mind now, but there are many others. What are yours?
Factzone: The truth about Kim Jong Il Kim Jong Il, the leader of the free world, has decided to move on to more fertile grounds, leaving with us just the memories of 8-color rainbows, singing Korean women and couple of nuclear weapons. But who was this man whose next ambition would have been to get the next Nobel Peace prize? Here are just a few facts you should know about.
World governments charged with criminal negligence (in response to Megaupload case) EARTH (thecheers.org) - Federal authorities of the universe have charged the governments of all the countries in the world as well as the operators actually in power in these countries with operating a criminal enterprise, the Galaxy warriors announced Today.
Steph says on 2007-04-30 12:33:05 about new vs. old
There's definitely new writing that is just as good, and just as meaningful, as the classics - while I agree that knowing the classics is important - even in a cultural literacy kind of way, so that if someone references Oliver Twist or The Scarlet Letter, you understand the reference - I think that including more current literature in high school would make it more interesting to a lot of non-English-major-destined students. :) Why does the entire book need to be taught? Give the kids a taste of the classics, help them to understand why the book is important, reading the "good parts" and leaving them with a sense of how to understand literature, rather than the memory of plodding through (or skimming, or skipping) long works they don't care about.
That said, the more current lit that I read in college and loved includes Pynchon's Crying of Lot 49 (surreal and layers of meaning) and Eco's The Name of the Rose (medieval and layers of meaning - once I understood the whole thing thanks to a wonderful teacher, I was amazed) plus Gaiman's American Gods just blew me away. Honestly, I think engaging students and teaching how to derive real meaning from what they read - whether it's Dickens or Stephen King or the X-Men - is the most important thing, and I think is definitely not presented to (non-English-major) students in a way they can grasp.
Great article!
WIAN says on 2007-04-27 00:05:32 about on Beauty...
oh its brilliant! its about a black family, Miss smith's narrative is well paced,witty, and hilarious. Its a must read. specially for the Americans who are aware of the black culture and their language.A very good book.
Margie says on 2007-04-26 09:55:21 about WIAN comment
I never read On Beauty either. At one point it was on my list and then forgot about it. Thanks for the reminder! Are you enjoying it?
WIAN says on 2007-04-26 00:23:42 about new lit.
brilliant article! you make some good points in there.
However, I think that the kids in school are given a classic to read for the same reason that we consider Led Zeppelin to be way better than any contemporary band-- we tend to overrate the past. Also, i think the schools don't wish their students to be oblivious of the writers of the past. You can easily get a contemporary writer's work on the shelf, but a dickens may be hard to find.
And you seem to have answered your question yourself. books of the past tell us about the cultures then, the thinking that went around, the kind of people there were.
Language has changed a great deal in the past few decades, and it is largely believed, though debatable, that English was in its essence in the past.
I am reading Zadie smith's on beauty now. a little late i know, but its still a joy. well thats why we love books. :)
DSE is the world's largest international trade show and conference dedicated to digital signage, interactive technology and digital out-of-home networks and it will be taking place from March 6 to March 9, 2012.
Argonaut Genre:Alternative The band are led by Core Members, Lorna (Vocals & Synths) an...
The Kut Genre:Alternative As three female musicians on the London circuit, questions l...
The Exits Genre:Electronic Genre: Electro / Indie / Rock
Location Portsmouth, South, U...
Trip Effect Genre:Rock A power trio that mashes up alternative/indie/rock with warm...
Jim Scordilis Genre:Rock jimscordilis@gmail.com
http://www.facebook.com/jimscordil...
Valadis Gaoutsis Genre:Rock Facebook Fan Page: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Valantis-G...
