Religious organizations will never do it, so perhaps it takes an agnostic to call for legal controls on greed.
Noble character—call it spirituality if you like—suggests self-control of appetite, humility, and a simple life. As we have evolved, however, we find ourselves the victims of the “I must get more” mentality. The desire for more of whatever we collect sometimes becomes overwhelming. Like manic squirrels, our success drives us to collect, hoard and control material wealth far beyond our ability to use or consume it.
Wealth accumulation often does not begin with greed; it may start as an unplanned result of creativity or invention. That’s a good thing about humans. We solve problems, we invent things, and we make life better. As a result, we may find our way to wealth.
In the process of personal success we can do great harm to others who have been either less successful or too trusting of our good will. Many people have accepted the foolish, selfish, and destructive philosophy of Ayn Rand in the belief that sharing is wrong and greed is good. Sadly, the presidency of George W. Bush has encouraged uncontrolled greed and discounted the importance of honest labor. This blind devotion to unregulated greed has led us into a major economic depression.
Almost daily we hear stories of out-of-control greed: a governor tries to sell a senate seat, a financial consultant steals billions from trusting investors, and a physician lies about research results to get a payoff from a pharmaceutical company. This points out the obvious: human greed should be monitored and limited by social controls for the good of all.
In the Bush administration, high taxes on the rich were reduced significantly giving the stamp of approval on greed. The steeply graduated income tax had been a step in the direction of greed control. At the same time the rich were getting a tax break, government supervision and regulation over our financial institutions were relaxed
We need a personal income limit. Let’s say, as a starting point, all individual income would be limited to two million dollars. Let’s not tax the first two million for anybody. However, if someone goes over that figure, while it would not be against the law, the tax would be one hundred percent. Whatever top income level we select, it should be enough for the individual to buy a fine home, own two automobiles, and send kids to college. Productive, creative people should live well.
What we would have with an income limit would be a two tier tax system: nothing of the first two million and everything on any income above that figure. The top figure, of course, would be the subject of discussion and debate by the experts; I just picked that figure as a point for discussion. I think I could live pretty well on two million dollars per year, but the fact is, I live pretty well now on a lot less.
How we tax industry and commerce in terms of removing the incentive for greed will involve complexity well beyond my ability as an amateur economist, but we very well could start by eliminating the subsidies and tax breaks the large corporations have bamboozled Congress into providing over the years. The petroleum and agricultural corporations in particular profit from these special gifts. Once that were done, we could think about how much profit is enough profit for any business so that all excess profits would revert to the common wealth pool.
How much is enough? As a society we need to answer that important question. Thousands of people in the United States would earn more than a two million upper limit and would be taxed accordingly. In truth, money is often not the real goal of productive people; when they exceed the limits of all they can use they often turn to charitable works in order to use the surplus. The motivation of successful people is far more complex than simple greed. I do not think that an income cap would stifle productivity or originality. In fact, if we look at the history of industrial society, we see that the really big inventions often came from individuals who were just starting out, people who had very little by way of personal wealth.
What we need to understand is that the common good is good for all of us no matter how uncommon we think we are.
Few humans alive today can really understand everything in the U.S. tax code. It will eventually collapse of its own weight and complexity. A limit on individual personal income would simplify the entire system and provide plenty of money to run the government. We could pay off our national debt. More importantly, it would encourage us to work for whatever rewards we find to be intrinsic in the work itself.
Why would limits of income be opposed by organized religions? Because, of course, thousands of people earn their livings selling religion. Some television evangelists become very wealthy in what is basically an entertainment business. Religion seems to be helpless in the face of greed.
(Julian I. Taber, Ph.D. is author of Addictions Anonymous: Outgrowing Addiction with a Universal, Secular Program of Self-Development: ISBN 978-1-60145-647-2, or go to: http://www.booklocker.com/books/3717.html)
Share this article

Tags:
Politics
Factzone: The truth about Kim Jong Il
 Kim Jong Il, the leader of the free world, has decided to move on to more fertile grounds, leaving with us just the memories of 8-color rainbows, singing Korean women and couple of nuclear weapons. But who was this man whose next ambition would have been to get the next Nobel Peace prize? Here are just a few facts you should know about.
more Top 5 Conspiracy Theories Related to John F. Kennedy's Assassination 26.Aug 2011 Since just after the assassination of John F. Kennedy, conspiracy theories abou...read
 ISRAEL KEEPING GHADDAFI AFLOAT 10.Mar 2011 ...read
 Glen Beck Is NOT the Anti-Christ! 10.Mar 2011 Hurtful and fiery rhetoric is now media’s default setting! This slippery and m...read
 Recipe for A REVOLUTION! (10 easy steps - try not to get burned!) 28.Feb 2011 Rebellion is cooking in the air. People are mad as hell, and not going to take...read
 Opinion
World governments charged with criminal negligence (in response to Megaupload case)
 EARTH (thecheers.org) - Federal authorities of the universe have charged the governments of all the countries in the world as well as the operators actually in power in these countries with operating a criminal enterprise, the Galaxy warriors announced Today.
more The Great OSCARS 2011 – or so it would seem 5.Mar 2011 So, how exciting......a morning off, the Academy Awards. I wish I could say the...read
 Top 7 Expensive Bordellos. Prostitution: Shakedown, Tier Down, and Priced Out 31.Jan 2011 According to a report of the Washington DC-based US Department of State, The Ph...read
 The Great Secret and Reason for the JFK Assassination 11.Oct 2010 The great question is why the great secret? On June 4 1963, President Kennedy s...read
 Don't Do it! The 3 Worst Times to Get Tattoos 4.Oct 2010 As a general rule, tattoos gotten after 2 am are a bad idea. But in a bigger pi...read
 |
Travel
Travel Warning 13 September 2010 - DO NOT TRAVEL TO IRAN 13.Sep 2010 TRAVELWISE has been watching the situation in Iran for some months in relation ...read
 more TRAVELWISE TRAVEL ADVISORY 5th June 2010. DO NOT TRAVEL TO ISRAEL. 5.Jun 2010 Given the recent incident whereby the Israeli intelligence agency, Mossad, used...read
 TRAVELWISE. 16 APRIL 2010. EUROPEAN TRAVEL ALTERNATIVES 16.Apr 2010 Travelwise issues the following advice in relation to cancelled flights to, fro...read
 TRAVELWISE 6 APRIL 2010. AUSTRALIAN AIR TRAVEL. THE BEST WAYS TO TRAVEL BY AIR IN AUSTRALIA. 5.Apr 2010 Regular readers might have seen and read the various advisory and no-fly notice...read
 TRAVELWISE 2 APRIL 2010. QANTAS. 2.Apr 2010 Some concerns have been raised in relation to some of the maintenance practices...read

 No Payoff From the Playoffs
 $16.50 will Get Anyone in the Hall Mr McGwire
 Stupid Athlete Tricks

 Think Big! Think the World's Largest International Trade Show
 Top 9 cool laptop accessories for laptop geeks
 Twittering: I'm not that interesting

Cheers
|
