   The Cheers magazine is looking for creative people to join our forces. We are looking for Sounds interesting? Click here for more info. 
See news about Latest news
Former Ambassador Joe Wilson as been proven a liar with the Senate Intelligence Committe's report. Of course, in irony, Wilson has a website called Restore Honesty that is endorsed by John Kerry. The name of Joe Wilsons site is ironic-restorehonesty.com. Its supposed to say it all; "Bush lied, and it's time to restore 'honesty' to the White House. Indeed, but that's beside the point; by the time you have read the first paragraph of Joe Wilson's website, you can already see a lie. Here is the quote,"I'm not a politician and I'm not a political partisan. I've served under Presidents from both parties. My loyalty has always been to country and Constitution." While reading the next paragraph, Wilson explains why he's not a political partisan --his reason being that the first President Bush appointed him as Ambassador to two African countries. Then, Clinton appointed him to be in charge of African affairs at the National Security Council. However, just because you are appointed by a republican or democrat doesn't mean you are bipartisan. You can still be a liberal democrat. Of course, your plans can change, just as your views will change, from the first Bush to Clinton. Just look at Al Gore- he used to be a bit conservative, then over time his views changed. You see this in Gore's 1992 interview on CNN, pertaining to Bush number one not doing enough to combat Saddam Hussein. Of course we've seen how the Clinton Administration dealt with Saddam. "Let's just lob some missiles over there, it'll 'contain' him." This is all beside the point. What I'm saying is even if Joe Wilson's views are the same, or changed, he's still a LIAR. Then again, a liberal would never admit to that. Therefore, while you're reading the writing on his site, in the last few lines of the second paragraph, he states, "this President Bush's Administration sent me to Africa to investigate claims that Saddam Hussein was seeking to buy materials for weapons of mass destruction, I was ready to serve." Really? "Ready to serve," even though Wilson lied saying President Bushs State Of The Union Speech was misleading on Iraq and prewar intelligence. He seemed to feed the media the "Bush is misleading speech" based on their claim citing British intelligence reports that Iraq was seeking Uranium in Niger like it was food. Wow, Dubya is being vindicated as each day goes on. I swear, I thought this site was put up to "restore" honesty --quote un-quote. On the July 9th, 2004, The Senate Intelligence Committee concluded that he lied when Wilson said, "His wife didn't suggest him for the Niger Job," just another lie from the left. Also, the report says that Wilson lied when stating that his report "disavowed" the Bush Administration's accusation that Iraq did in fact seek Uranium from Niger. The SIC catches Wilson in more of his dishonesty. Wilson reported back to the CIA, citing he was skeptical on the Iraq-Niger Uranium claim, but he never reported that his information was wrong and that documents had been forged. Of course, the CIA did not receive the documents until eight months later when the good ambassador arrived back from Africa. However, the report does say that an Iraqi deligation did visit Niger, and that Niger's Prime Minister thinks the deligation was seeking Uranium. This again supports the Britsh claim and the Bush Administration's claim that Saddam may have in fact been seeking weapons grade Uranium. I'm beginning to think Wilson is a pathological liar. Of course, if you'd like to see for yourself, you can tap the Republican National Committee's website and the facts are presented right there. If you don't trust the RNC, you can look at the Committee's report. Wilson also says, "People have called him courageous for telling the truth," he then says, "It doesn't compare to what John Kerry did in Vietnam." No Kidding, he's right it doesn't compare. Lberals are calling Wilson courageous for telling a lie. He still hasn't changed his site and John Kerry is still using the "Bush lied" rhetoric. When will you admit you lied, Mr. Wilson? I'm just curious. Of course, this site is also funded by John Kerry. How do I know? Where it says "send us your thoughts," you click into an email window that appears with this address "restorehonesty@johnkerry.com." Also, what I loved reading on Wilson's site is that he says, "Kerry has integrity." Indeed, if Kerry did have "integrity" he'd be able to straighten his policies out and stop flip-flopping on the issues. John Kerry would also be able to form a plan on fighting the War on Terror, but it seems to me that the only thing John Kerry can do is hire Sandy Berger, who stole "classified documents" from the National Archives by stuffing them in his pants. Mr. Wilson, I thought this site was created to restore HONESTY. Where is it? I'm still not seeing it. As Ann Coulter points out, the committee was established to find the weaknesses in our intelligence gathering. She also points out that Wilson's wife, "gathers intelligence on WMDs." Who'd have thought? At least we know now what the problems are when gathering intelligence. Wilson also says he wasn't ready to keep quiet when the president lied. Contrary to what he says, evidence seems to suggest he lied and the media is keeping quiet. There seems to be more with the lack of Wilson's honesty and the honesty of the site. He should probably change the name of his site to "pathologicalliairshonesty.com." Then, include an opening endorsed by John Kerry, whose informal advisor just resigned due to allegation that he stole classified documents on terrorism. John Kerry really seems to be putting together a honest team- a liar and a thief. Next, we'll be hearing he's employed Michael Moore, who could possibly be charged in Canada for interfering in their election. None of these men are honest, and all liberals seem to be taking their rhetoric as truth even though investigations are contradicting the statements made by Wilson. In all honesty, this is just another example of liberal treachery. Lying is not treasonous, nor was Bergers theft, but if the criminal investigation does show that Berger used the documents stolen from the National Archives to help Kerry, he should be punished severly. I'm sure if John Kerry had enough intelligence he could define himself and his campaign. However, this does not seem to be true. It seems that his campaign is: "blame Bush. Bush lied on the intel of Iraq seeking Uranium from Niger." His campaign is also about how many more LIES they can tell to the public. As Ann Coulter states, liberal thought is "Bush Lied, Kids Died." Well, I say "Wilson lied, liberals cried, and Bush helped Iraqi kids survive." AUTHOR: Eric Webb  TAGS: Politics food iraq cnn war combat men US liberals BOOKMARK: Digg it | Add to Del.ICIO | Add to FARK ACTIONS: Comment Save Print Register free acount 
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
