Once you get born it eventually becomes clear that there is only one way out, and it’s called dying. As the police sometimes say, when they arrest a violent criminal, “You can do this the hard way or the easy way.” When it comes to getting dead, we often don’t have much choice. There are thousands of horrible ways to die, and the chances of having a gentle death are actually pretty small. Even old age, while not a disease, brings infirmities and miseries of its own, most of which are not terminal.
Dying of old age can’t be a lot of fun, but it’s probably much better than unexpected and abrupt departures caused by war, accident, or murder.
As a culture, we could help many more people avoid the agonies of protracted dying with assisted suicide, an option that seems to be gaining in acceptability.
The State of Oregon passed, by popular vote, a physician assisted suicide law in 1998. (See: http://www.oregon.gov/DHS/ph/pas/). By the end of 2007, 341 terminally ill patients had used the right to end their lives and their suffering by taking a lethal amount of prescribed drugs. The Catholic Church and some health care groups spent millions to defeat this law, and the state was eventually forced to put it back on the ballot where it was again approved by a majority of voters in Oregon. To date there have been no reported abuses of the law by relatives, practitioners, or organizations.
“Right to Die” or “Death with Dignity” laws are vigorously opposed by the Catholic Church as well as by other health care groups. Why? I suspect it is all about the money. Many years ago, using the huge force of cheap labor provided by various religious orders, the church moved into the health care business by developing hospitals and care facilities. No doubt many sisters who worked in health care did so from noble motives, from concern for the comfort of the sick and dying. Church leaders, however, saw this as a huge source of income.
Those who profit from caring for the terminally ill probably don’t care where the money comes from. be it insurance companies, family savings, or the government. They have to cover the payroll and have some left for profit.
A terminal illness can cost many thousands of dollars and cause protracted misery both for the patient and for his/her family. The savings of a lifetime can vanish in mere weeks as various treatments and tests follow one after the other. Even the simplest daily care in a nursing home is extremely expensive.
The two main objections to assisted suicide seem to be the religious idea that life is sacred and the fear that unscrupulous people will use the law for evil purposes. So, the question is: should terminally ill people be denied the right to a peaceful and painless death because some people have religion-based opinions or because there is the chance that the law will be abused? We already have many laws that permit behaviors (gambling, drinking, abortion, etc.) that are not approved of by various religions, and many good laws are violated by criminals. The possibility of criminal violation of a law should not prevent its establishment if the law benefits and is favored by the majority of voters.
Unbearable pain, life in a coma or semi-coma, and all the expenses of prolonging life with no hope of recovery—these set the stage for a rational decision in favor of an early departure.
In Oregon, the great majority of the 341 approved assisted suicides resulted from advancing cancer of various types.
Washington State put an assisted suicide measure on the ballot in 2008 and it was approved by a substantial majority. (See: http://wei.secstate.wa.gov/osos/en/Documents/I1000-Text%20for%20web.pdf)
Oregon and Washington in the United States joined Switzerland, Belgium, and The Netherlands in making assisted suicide legal according to Derek Humphry who founded the Hemlock Society in 1980 and more recently the Euthanasia Research & Guidance Organization. He is the author of the book Final Exit (www.assistedsuicide.org). Many other countries are either ambiguous about or tolerant of assisted suicide without making it a matter of actual law.
The usual rule is that two physicians must certify that the patient asking for assisted suicide has six months or less to live. This has caused some controversy in the medical profession which, of course, has the primary obligation to save and improve life, not to help end it.
There is even now an emerging profession called Thanatology that has the potential for solving many ethical concerns. There is a certification program based on required studies and on an examination process offered by Association for Death Education and Counseling (http://www.adec.org/certification/FT_info.cfm).
No physician should ever be required to prescribe a lethal dose of drugs in the assisted suicide situation. Many will never do so. On the other hand, death is more of a social problem than a medical matter once it has become certain. Suicide was decriminalized some time ago in most of the modern world. Regulated assisted suicide may not be far behind.
Although the cooperation of medical doctors in determining the life expectancy of a dying patient is vital, trained and qualified thanatologists from any discipline should be available as case managers. There is so much to do beyond attending to the medial needs of the patient, areas in which physicians are not generally trained or interested. These areas include counseling the dying patient, family therapy, financial counseling, and legal matters such as final directives, wills, post death memorial services, and so forth. A qualified thanatologist might come from other professions such as social work, psychology, pastoral counseling, or law. In any case, it would be most efficient if the thanatologist, with proper certification or license, had direct access to the drugs needed to end the life. This would relieve the physicians’ ethical concerns about having to end a life.
(Julian I. Taber, Ph.D. is author of Addictions Anonymous: Outgrowing Addiction with a Universal, Secular Program of Self-Development: ISBN 978-1-60145-647-2)
Politics
Factzone: The truth about Kim Jong Il
 Kim Jong Il, the leader of the free world, has decided to move on to more fertile grounds, leaving with us just the memories of 8-color rainbows, singing Korean women and couple of nuclear weapons. But who was this man whose next ambition would have been to get the next Nobel Peace prize? Here are just a few facts you should know about.
more Top 5 Conspiracy Theories Related to John F. Kennedy's Assassination 26.Aug 2011 Since just after the assassination of John F. Kennedy, conspiracy theories abou...read
 ISRAEL KEEPING GHADDAFI AFLOAT 10.Mar 2011 ...read
 Glen Beck Is NOT the Anti-Christ! 10.Mar 2011 Hurtful and fiery rhetoric is now media’s default setting! This slippery and m...read
 Recipe for A REVOLUTION! (10 easy steps - try not to get burned!) 28.Feb 2011 Rebellion is cooking in the air. People are mad as hell, and not going to take...read
 Opinion
World governments charged with criminal negligence (in response to Megaupload case)
 EARTH (thecheers.org) - Federal authorities of the universe have charged the governments of all the countries in the world as well as the operators actually in power in these countries with operating a criminal enterprise, the Galaxy warriors announced Today.
more The Great OSCARS 2011 – or so it would seem 5.Mar 2011 So, how exciting......a morning off, the Academy Awards. I wish I could say the...read
 Top 7 Expensive Bordellos. Prostitution: Shakedown, Tier Down, and Priced Out 31.Jan 2011 According to a report of the Washington DC-based US Department of State, The Ph...read
 The Great Secret and Reason for the JFK Assassination 11.Oct 2010 The great question is why the great secret? On June 4 1963, President Kennedy s...read
 Don't Do it! The 3 Worst Times to Get Tattoos 4.Oct 2010 As a general rule, tattoos gotten after 2 am are a bad idea. But in a bigger pi...read
 |
Travel
Travel Warning 13 September 2010 - DO NOT TRAVEL TO IRAN 13.Sep 2010 TRAVELWISE has been watching the situation in Iran for some months in relation ...read
 more TRAVELWISE TRAVEL ADVISORY 5th June 2010. DO NOT TRAVEL TO ISRAEL. 5.Jun 2010 Given the recent incident whereby the Israeli intelligence agency, Mossad, used...read
 TRAVELWISE. 16 APRIL 2010. EUROPEAN TRAVEL ALTERNATIVES 16.Apr 2010 Travelwise issues the following advice in relation to cancelled flights to, fro...read
 TRAVELWISE 6 APRIL 2010. AUSTRALIAN AIR TRAVEL. THE BEST WAYS TO TRAVEL BY AIR IN AUSTRALIA. 5.Apr 2010 Regular readers might have seen and read the various advisory and no-fly notice...read
 TRAVELWISE 2 APRIL 2010. QANTAS. 2.Apr 2010 Some concerns have been raised in relation to some of the maintenance practices...read

 No Payoff From the Playoffs
 $16.50 will Get Anyone in the Hall Mr McGwire
 Stupid Athlete Tricks

 Think Big! Think the World's Largest International Trade Show
 Top 9 cool laptop accessories for laptop geeks
 Twittering: I'm not that interesting

Cheers
|
