There once was a man who fell
in love with and bought a two hundred year old house. It had some
problems although it was attractive, historically important and
certainly worth preserving. But, he wanted to be able to live in it, so
he added new bathrooms, built an annex for a modern kitchen and some
larger bedrooms.
Of course, he needed new
plumbing, a furnace for central heating, more storage space and a
garage. Rather than keep the old house as it was for historic reasons,
the new owner made additions and modifications leaving the original
house as no more than an appendage to his improvements. The historical
interest and value were lost, hidden by the improvements. The grounds
on which the house stood had room for a second home. Building a
different home would have left the historic house as it was, but the
owner ignored that.
Over time, we seem to be doing
something like that with the United States Constitution. We cannot
bring ourselves to leave the old historically important wording and
build a more modern version on the same ground, a version that might be
more comfortable to live in. In almost every other area of human
endeavor we do not hesitate to build better mouse traps. Just compare,
if you will, the ships of the Eighteenth Century with those of today.
In which would you want to sail across the dangerous Atlantic Ocean if
you decided not to fly? Would you choose to sail for three months on an
old sailing ship with no modern conveniences, or would you prefer a
much safer modern cruise ship that would cross the Atlantic in less
than a week? We welcome new versions of airplanes, surgical tools, and
computers with enthusiasm. But blind loyalty and fear of change hold us
to our old Constitution. Perhaps we correctly fear that opening any
part of The Constitution to change would trigger a bitter and
unsolvable war between powerful special interests.
Aside from the cumbersome
amendments process, The Constitution allows for a constitution
convention, but specifies it would only be for the same purpose of
amending, not for re-writing. Other ways of improving the
wording might include what the founders succeeded in doing: hold a
convention devoted to a total re-writing of the Constitution. When The
Constitution’s framers first met they threw out the old Articles Of
Confederation and started a whole new document. This, of course, would
probably be unconstitutional today. Today, that approach, aside from
its illegality, could be explosive and lead to a prolonged and
uncertain outcome. A second and very different way could be gradualism or
model-building, a re-thinking process in a series of small steps
continuing over time. I will be suggesting a model-building approach
later in this series, and I certainly do not favor a single convention
for total revision because, in the very unlikely event that one was
assembled, such a convention would probably end in disaster.
It is not for me to demand
specific changes in wording; that is a job for the voters and their
representatives. My hope would be to raise some questions and get
discussions started, so let me highlight a few problem areas.
[BB]
In describing how voters will elect members of the House Of Representatives (Article I, Section 1) The Constitution tells us:
“Representatives and direct
Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be
included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers,
which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free
Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and
excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.”
We no longer have indentured servants bound for a term of years to anyone, we no longer refer to Native Americans as Indians,
and no one these days is ever counted as three fifths of a person. The
latter is taken to refer to slaves held in ownership. Also open to
question here is who or what is a citizen or free Person. Women could not vote, so one supposes that women were not free Persons, nor were they slaves. Women
were probably far too busy keeping themselves and their children
healthy and alive to have time for politics. Exactly what women were
considered to be in not spelled out; perhaps they were mere chattel,
household possession or simply taken for granted and thought to be just
mirrors of their fathers and husbands opinions. It is not even clear
that they counted for anything more the three fifths of a person or
even as persons.
In 1865 the following amendment was ratified and became law:
Amendment XIII
“1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crimewhereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
“2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.”
Well, that got rid of slavery,
but the old wording in the body of The Constitution remains today. It
remains to remind of us of the bad old days. The old wording is, of
course, historically important, but its place in our Constitutions
today is insulting and inappropriate. I doubt very much that the any
majority of American citizens today would object to a revision of
wording to better reflect today’s culture.
And then, in 1920, we got:
Amendment XIX:
“The right of citizens of the
United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged in the United
States or by any State on account of sex
“Congress shall have the power to enforce this article with appropriate legislation.”
So, by amendment, we fixed the
problem of slavery, women were referred to as citizens and females had
the right to vote. However, the old language remains in the living body
of The Constitution and cannot be erased. Such ancient thinking
deserves to be remembered, but does not belong in a document we hope
all citizens would read and appreciate for the relevance today.
If you take the time to read
the Constitution through you will find quite a few puzzling phrases,
and it will be necessary to study and understand the subsequent
amendments to see what has been cancelled, corrected or added to. As
time goes by, however, the list of amendments grows longer while the
body of the law itself become increasingly irrelevant.
Politics
Factzone: The truth about Kim Jong Il
Kim Jong Il, the leader of the free world, has decided to move on to more fertile grounds, leaving with us just the memories of 8-color rainbows, singing Korean women and couple of nuclear weapons. But who was this man whose next ambition would have been to get the next Nobel Peace prize? Here are just a few facts you should know about.
more
Top 5 Conspiracy Theories Related to John F. Kennedy's Assassination
26.Aug 2011
Since just after the assassination of John F. Kennedy, conspiracy theories abou...read
ISRAEL KEEPING GHADDAFI AFLOAT
10.Mar 2011
...read
Glen Beck Is NOT the Anti-Christ!
10.Mar 2011
Hurtful and fiery rhetoric is now media’s default setting! This slippery and m...read
Recipe for A REVOLUTION! (10 easy steps - try not to get burned!)
28.Feb 2011
Rebellion is cooking in the air. People are mad as hell, and not going to take...read
Opinion
World governments charged with criminal negligence (in response to Megaupload case)
EARTH (thecheers.org) - Federal authorities of the universe have charged the governments of all the countries in the world as well as the operators actually in power in these countries with operating a criminal enterprise, the Galaxy warriors announced Today.
more
The Great OSCARS 2011 – or so it would seem
5.Mar 2011
So, how exciting......a morning off, the Academy Awards. I wish I could say the...read
Top 7 Expensive Bordellos. Prostitution: Shakedown, Tier Down, and Priced Out
31.Jan 2011
According to a report of the Washington DC-based US Department of State, The Ph...read
The Great Secret and Reason for the JFK Assassination
11.Oct 2010
The great question is why the great secret? On June 4 1963, President Kennedy s...read
Don't Do it! The 3 Worst Times to Get Tattoos
4.Oct 2010
As a general rule, tattoos gotten after 2 am are a bad idea. But in a bigger pi...read
|
Travel
Travel Warning 13 September 2010 - DO NOT TRAVEL TO IRAN
13.Sep 2010
TRAVELWISE has been watching the situation in Iran for some months in relation ...read
more
TRAVELWISE TRAVEL ADVISORY 5th June 2010. DO NOT TRAVEL TO ISRAEL.
5.Jun 2010
Given the recent incident whereby the Israeli intelligence agency, Mossad, used...read
TRAVELWISE. 16 APRIL 2010. EUROPEAN TRAVEL ALTERNATIVES
16.Apr 2010
Travelwise issues the following advice in relation to cancelled flights to, fro...read
TRAVELWISE 6 APRIL 2010. AUSTRALIAN AIR TRAVEL. THE BEST WAYS TO TRAVEL BY AIR IN AUSTRALIA.
5.Apr 2010
Regular readers might have seen and read the various advisory and no-fly notice...read
TRAVELWISE 2 APRIL 2010. QANTAS.
2.Apr 2010
Some concerns have been raised in relation to some of the maintenance practices...read
No Payoff From the Playoffs
$16.50 will Get Anyone in the Hall Mr McGwire
Stupid Athlete Tricks
Think Big! Think the World's Largest International Trade Show
Top 9 cool laptop accessories for laptop geeks
Twittering: I'm not that interesting
Cheers
|
