Great American Dumb Ideas: Designer God

The Bible tells us in the first verse of Genesis: "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth."

And then He did a whole bunch of other snuff until we get, "27. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them."

Or did he?

In the United States, you are certainly free to believe or not believe any of this, and if you are a believer you can teach it to your kids, talk freely about it, even try to sell it to your friends and neighbors if you like. But, there are legal limits. You can't use force, threats, politics, economic circumstance, or any coercive means to get others to believe your favorite religious fantasies. And according to the United States Constitution, the government and religion will be forever separate.

Or are they?

Not under George W. Bush, a Christian fanatic who diverts taxpayer dollars to religious charities. When he's not making war, he talks to God, but never to Congress or to anyone who might challenge his ideas.

Back to a basic question: How and when did we get here? Did we suddenly appear in our present form along with all the other species at some point in recent history? Or, did we evolve slowly from other species under the guidance and supervision of God? Or, did we evolve along with all the other species over millions of years as the result of natural law with no help from supernatural forces such as a god?

In many parts of the world, people regard us as crazy when we take the Bible as literal truth. In a recent poll published in the journal Science and reported in the New York Times, people were asked, "Did human beings, as we know them, develop from earlier species of animals?" Over fifty percent of Americans said, "No," rejecting evolution as an explanation of our existence. England and twenty European countries were included in the poll. Only Turkey has more creationist believers than the United States. The top four countries with a majority who accept evolution were Iceland, Denmark, Sweden, and France.

In graphic contrast to the majority of Americans, only about five percent of scientists believe in Biblical creationism. Almost all scientists in all fields accept evolution as a work of nature alone.

The appeal: Ideas about divine creation flourish among the poorly educated, the lower income brackets, and in rural settings. Sadly, these groups describe a majority of Americans. They want to believe in a personal God who not only created humans, but also knows them as individuals, cares about them, and listens to prayers. They want to think God created people as special creatures and that the hand of a personal God is at work in their lives. They accept anecdotes, legends, and testimonials as evidence while fearing science, scientists, and natural law, none of which they understand any more than they understand scientific method.

Faith asks us to believe something to be true when there is no evidence to support it. Faith does not know or honor the rules of evidence in science or law. Twenty-five percent of American college graduates are creationists while sixty-five percent of those without high school diplomas are creationists. The American public school system, for the most part, fails to teach much real science, and students avoid what they consider to be difficult subjects. We import many of our best scientists from countries with better educational systems.

And then there is this obvious truth: the fruits of science make life better, religion divides us.

Making money on it: Underneath Christian fanaticism lies a profit motive. Religious leaders make their money selling belief. Bright, educated people are not buying, so the religion industry has a big stake in people who are uninformed and scared. The educational and social under-classes provide essential customer support. The appeal of creationism is to ignorance, provincialism, and emotion.

For years now, in the United States, Christian fanatics have been trying to force creationism into the public schools, not just as philosophy, but as part of biological science courses. They've worked hard to get their followers onto local school boards where course content can be manipulated against the best judgment of teachers. They made up the term creation science having found that they could not use the word God in their suggested curriculum. When it became clear that the word "creation" was not acceptable when used along with "science," they invented a fraud called intelligent design.

Devout creationist Henry Morris and others put together this idea of intelligent design. It became the guiding principle of The Institute for Creation Research, sometimes known as the Center for Renewal of Science and Culture. Religious organizations and wealthy individuals fund this organization. Intelligent design, however, does not involve any real science or research. It is not the subject of any papers in real science journals.

The Intelligent Design people did have to give up, or pretend to give up, the idea that God created all living things in their present form all at one time. That just would not fly as parts of any high school biology course.

The intelligent design propagandists have two favorite strategies. If they find what they call a gap in the fossil record, they claim this as evidence of creation or at least the fallibility of evolution as an explanation. The absence of one thing, of course, does not prove the existence of something else. Second, they like to find some very complex biological phenomenon and claim that there had to be a designer, such things as a human eye or a complex microorganism could never evolve without divine guidance according to intelligent design theory.

Unfortunately for the creationists, evolution is not a theory, it is natural law. Evolution is not just fossils. Evolution is the experimental development of species variations in a laboratory, and changes observable in nature. It is the study of the historical record provided by genetic material (DNA).

There is little mystery in Darwin's simple propositions: individuals vary in their characteristics, and the environment imposes natural selection that picks which will survive and reproduce. This is far, far less complicated than intelligent design, and it is testable.

Recent court cases in Alabama (McClain v. Alabama) and Pennsylvania (Fitzmiller v. Dover)— cases in which creationists attempted to force their ideas into science education— resulted in resounding defeats for the intelligent design people. Furthermore, mainstream religion in the United States rejects any form of literal creationism along with the idea of intelligent design.

Is there a better idea? If you Google the work of Eugenie C. Scott, Ph.D. of the National Center for Science and Education you will find a scientist who had done a great deal to debunk intelligent design and defend a natural science curriculum for high school biology.

Science and scientific method are good ideas. Science works.

Next month: Prohibition

Share this article

Tags: design    style   people   kids   politics   

Politics Factzone: The truth about Kim Jong Il Kim Jong Il, the leader of the free world, has decided to move on to more fertile grounds, leaving with us just the memories of 8-color rainbows, singing Korean women and couple of nuclear weapons. But who was this man whose next ambition would have been to get the next Nobel Peace prize? Here are just a few facts you should know about. more Top 5 Conspiracy Theories Related to John F. Kennedy's Assassination 26.Aug 2011 Since just after the assassination of John F. Kennedy, conspiracy theories abou...read ISRAEL KEEPING GHADDAFI AFLOAT 10.Mar 2011 ...read Glen Beck Is NOT the Anti-Christ! 10.Mar 2011 Hurtful and fiery rhetoric is now media’s default setting! This slippery and m...read Recipe for A REVOLUTION! (10 easy steps - try not to get burned!) 28.Feb 2011 Rebellion is cooking in the air. People are mad as hell, and not going to take...read THE ASSANGE CASE. CIA INTERFERED WITH SWEDISH LEGAL PROCESSES EXTREME RIGHT POLITICS A DANGER TO EUROPEAN UNITY THE AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY. OUT OF TOUCH, OUT OF FOCUS, OUT OF CREDIBILITY AND HOPEFULLY, OUT OF THE DOOR Opinion World governments charged with criminal negligence (in response to Megaupload case) EARTH (thecheers.org) - Federal authorities of the universe have charged the governments of all the countries in the world as well as the operators actually in power in these countries with operating a criminal enterprise, the Galaxy warriors announced Today. more The Great OSCARS 2011 – or so it would seem 5.Mar 2011 So, how exciting......a morning off, the Academy Awards. I wish I could say the...read Top 7 Expensive Bordellos. Prostitution: Shakedown, Tier Down, and Priced Out 31.Jan 2011 According to a report of the Washington DC-based US Department of State, The Ph...read The Great Secret and Reason for the JFK Assassination 11.Oct 2010 The great question is why the great secret? On June 4 1963, President Kennedy s...read Don't Do it! The 3 Worst Times to Get Tattoos 4.Oct 2010 As a general rule, tattoos gotten after 2 am are a bad idea. But in a bigger pi...read

Travel Travel Warning 13 September 2010 - DO NOT TRAVEL TO IRAN 13.Sep 2010 TRAVELWISE has been watching the situation in Iran for some months in relation ...read more TRAVELWISE TRAVEL ADVISORY 5th June 2010. DO NOT TRAVEL TO ISRAEL. 5.Jun 2010 Given the recent incident whereby the Israeli intelligence agency, Mossad, used...read TRAVELWISE. 16 APRIL 2010. EUROPEAN TRAVEL ALTERNATIVES 16.Apr 2010 Travelwise issues the following advice in relation to cancelled flights to, fro...read TRAVELWISE 6 APRIL 2010. AUSTRALIAN AIR TRAVEL. THE BEST WAYS TO TRAVEL BY AIR IN AUSTRALIA. 5.Apr 2010 Regular readers might have seen and read the various advisory and no-fly notice...read TRAVELWISE 2 APRIL 2010. QANTAS. 2.Apr 2010 Some concerns have been raised in relation to some of the maintenance practices...read Sport No Payoff From the Playoffs $16.50 will Get Anyone in the Hall Mr McGwire Stupid Athlete Tricks Technology Think Big! Think the World's Largest International Trade Show Top 9 cool laptop accessories for laptop geeks Twittering: I'm not that interesting Cheers Jesus' Answering Machine Brown Couch or twelve midgets in the town square How To Be Happy Drugged Out Saturday Nights Muslim Decapitation: Bad, or Simply Misunderstood?

USA says on 2012-02-11 21:45:56 about GdczovexsLr 7lK0lA I was looking for the report in Yandex and suddenly came across this page. I found a little information on my topic of my report. I would like more, and thanks for that..!!

BigEarl says on 2011-04-12 07:10:14 about Evolution Sir: You make an argument for micro-evolution, then use it to make a quantum leap to macro-evolution as a "law". Shall I point out your fallacies?

Let My People Think says on 2009-02-01 23:05:14 about THINK NOT FEEL Natural science could have NEVER invented the medium for you to write this baseless theology. We will be devouring each other and inventing the computer will the least thing on our minds; survival will be the only priority. Intelligence does not fall from the skies, there would have been no reason for schools. Wisdom does not parade the streets, there would be no need for experience. THINK people THINK. Remember some of the greatest inventions were by serendipity because the designer knew we would have never imagined even in a trillion years as you vainly hope to understand this world with your natural science someday. THINK people THINK. Rejection of the your maker is not an intellectual decision but a moral choice. You are a psycologist you should know this. It is man's pursuit to purge his conscience of GUILT. Today we quiver at evil done by religious fanatics but you can trust me on this, it is nothing compared to the evil done by the guiltless, Godless man. After all to them man is just matter and where do we reason with such a person (no point of reference).Its all about him and to hell with the others.

	Post Comment    Your nickname    About what    Your comment   Are you human? How much is 1 + 2?